|
More
troops, funding and medical staff are urgently needed to prevent the Ebola
outbreak becoming the "definitive humanitarian disaster of our
generation", Oxfam has warned.
According
to Press Association the UK-based charity said there was less than a two-month
window to curb the spread of the deadly virus but there remained a
"crippling shortfall" in military personnel to provide logistical
support across West Africa.
More
than 4,500 people have died from the disease, mainly in Guinea, Liberia and
Sierra Leone.
Oxfam
said that while Britain was leading the way in Europe's response to the
epidemic, countries which have failed to commit troops - including Italy and
Spain - were "in danger of costing lives".
The
charity said it was "extremely rare" to call for military
intervention but troops were "desperately needed" to build treatment
centres, provide flights and offer engineering and logistical support.
More
doctors and nurses were required to staff the treatment centres and there was a
"significant shortfall" in funding to support the emergency
humanitarian response, the agency warned.
The
Oxford-based charity has called for European Union foreign ministers meeting in
Brussels on Monday to follow the UK's lead in responding to the Ebola crisis
after the country committed £125 million - the second highest sum after the
United States.
It
comes after David Cameron called for fellow EU leaders to double their contribution
to the fight to tackle the virus, demanding a combined one billion euro (£800
million) pledge.
Mark
Goldring, Oxfam's chief executive said: "We are in the eye of a storm. We
cannot allow Ebola to immobilize us in fear, but instead we must move toward a
common mission to stop it from getting worse.
"Countries
that have failed to commit troops, doctors and enough funding are in danger of
costing lives. The speed and scale of the intervention needed is unprecedented.
Only a concerted and co-ordinated global effort will stop the spread.
"Oxfam
is concentrating its work in Sierra Leone and Liberia on helping to prevent the
spread of Ebola, through clean water and sanitation provision and public
education.
"Providing
treatment is vital, however reducing the spread of infection is equally
important, which is why we need the massive intervention of personnel and
funding immediately."
An
Oxfam spokeswoman added: "The Ebola crisis could become the definitive
humanitarian disaster of our generation. The world was unprepared to deal with
it. It is extremely rare for Oxfam to call for military intervention to provide
logistical support in a humanitarian emergency.
"However,
the military's logistical expertise and capacity to respond quickly in great
numbers is vital.
"The
EU can help put the world back on track in the fight against Ebola by boosting
military and medical personnel, committing life-saving funds and speeding up
the process so that pledges are delivered rapidly in order to prevent, protect
and cure people."
The
US and the UK have committed 4,000 and 750 troops respectively to help tackle
Ebola, Oxfam said.
But
the charity warned only some of these troops are on the ground, with most of
the US contingent due by November 1.
Italy,
Australia and Spain have committed no troops, despite Spain having a specialist
medical expertise unit in its military, Oxfam said.
Germany
has committed to military supply flights and plans a military hospital in the
region, while France has some military staff in Guinea where personnel are
reportedly building a hospital, it added.
A
spokeswoman for Oxfam said it understands the "tremendous logistical
challenges" but urged military groups to look how their mobilization can
be "both massively strengthened and sped up".
When
a fund was set up by the UN Secretary General to fight Ebola in September, it
was estimated almost one billion dollars (£620 million) was needed for the next
six months. To date, only half of this amount has been reached, Oxfam said.
The
charity has also issued an appeal for £22 million to triple its emergency
response in Liberia and Sierra Leone but said it was " nowhere near this
target yet".
The
number of Ebola cases is doubling about every 20 days, Oxfam said. The WHO has
put the death rate from this outbreak at 70% and has warned that there could be
10,000 new cases a week in West Africa by December.
|
The
World Health Organization said it was focused on halting the epidemic
"before the death toll rises to even more alarming levels" after a
leaked internal document reportedly revealed the agency missed chances to stop
the virus spreading. Its experts failed to grasp that traditional methods to
contain infectious diseases would not work in a region with porous borders and
broken health systems, according to the report, obtained by the Associated
Press.
"Nearly
everyone involved in the outbreak response failed to see some fairly plain
writing on the wall," the WHO was reported to have said. "A perfect
storm was brewing, ready to burst open in full force."
The
WHO said it would not comment on an internal document but defended its response
to the epidemic.
WHO
spokesman Tarik Jasarevic said: "As soon as the WHO received notification
from Guinea in late March that the first cases of Ebola virus disease had been
identified, we immediately mobilized experts and sent supplies to Guinea, then
to Liberia and Sierra Leone.
"We
will have time to analyse our response in the early phase of the outbreak once
we get this outbreak stopped.
"But
for the moment the WHO is focused on halting the Ebola outbreak in Liberia,
Sierra Leone and Guinea as soon as possible, before the death toll rises to
even more alarming levels."
A
leading aid agency has voiced anger over the "slow and inadequate"
world response to the Ebola crisis.
Vickie
Hawkins, executive director of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF),
said national and global health systems had "failed" and the task of
tackling the epidemic remained "very large and difficult". She
said: "At MSF we are frustrated and angry that the global response to this
outbreak has been so slow and inadequate. We
have been amazed that for months the burden of the response could be carried by
one single, private medical organization,
whilst pleading for more help and watching the situation get worse and worse. When
the outbreak is under control, we must reflect on how national and global
health systems can have failed quite so badly. But the priority for now must
remain the urgent fight against Ebola - the job ahead is very large and
difficult but we simply cannot afford to fail."
No comments:
Post a Comment