After her oldest daughter
was killed in May 2016, Michelle McDaniel and the rest of her family isolated
themselves in their small Texas town out of fear that the unknown killer could
be standing in line with them at the grocery store or passing them on the
street.
Associated
Press report continues:
Then
early last month, Brown County sheriff's investigators sent McDaniel a sketch
of the man they suspected in her daughter's death, despite having no witnesses.
The sketch was created using DNA found at the crime scene; a private lab used
the sample to predict the shape of the killer's face, his skin tone, eye color
and hair color.
Within
a week, the sheriff's office had a suspect in custody.
For
McDaniel, the DNA sketch technology known as phenotyping was an answered
prayer. For law enforcement officers, it's a relatively new tool that can
generate leads in cold cases or narrow a suspect pool. But for some ethicists
and lawyers, it's an untested advancement that if used incorrectly could lead
to racial profiling or ensnaring innocent people as suspects.
At
a news conference a week after the sketch was released, Brown County Sheriff
Vance Hill announced that 21-year-old Ryan Riggs had confessed to the beating
death of 25-year-old Chantay Blankinship. Authorities have said they believe
the killing was premeditated but have not released a motive. Riggs is being
held without bond on a capital murder charge in the Brown County Jail about 170
miles (275 kilometers) southwest of Dallas.
"My
son called me after seeing the sketch and said, 'Mom, I think I know this kid.
He used to bully me in school.' He sat behind her in church. His mom picked her
up every week and took her to church. ... He was best friends with my niece and
her friends. And we wouldn't have known," McDaniel said.
Several
private companies offer phenotyping services to law enforcement to create
sketches of suspects or victims when decomposed remains are found. The process
looks for markers inside of a DNA sample known to be linked to certain traits.
Police in at least 22 states have released suspect sketches generated through
phenotyping.
It
works like this: Companies have created a predictive formula using the DNA of
volunteers who also took a physical traits survey or had their face scanned by
recognition software. That predictive model is used to search the DNA samples
for specific markers and rate the likelihood that certain characteristics
exist.
For
some ethicists and lawyers, however, releasing a sketch of a suspect without
any witnesses seems like a dangerous proposition. Jay Stanley, a senior policy
analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union, said that from what scientists
have said and written, not enough is known about the link between genes and
facial features to rely on the technology to produce a suspect.
"You
can lose weight, gain weight, change gender, grow a beard, have plastic
surgery," Stanley said. "It risks ensnaring innocent people in webs
of suspicious investigations. It risks playing on existing societal racial
prejudices. It risks diverting investigations down wild goose chases. If this
technology were used to set up dragnets say to bring in every albino person in
an area as a suspect because the DNA seemed to show someone had that trait,
that's where we would object."
Stanley
also noted previous issues with forensic science advancement in the past,
including bad practices in DNA testing from hair samples a few years ago.
Steve
Armentrout, the CEO of Parabon NanoLabs, which created the Brown County sketch,
said phenotyping isn't meant to replace court-tested methods of identifying
suspects. He said it's an investigative tool.
"In
every case we are involved in there is DNA. This isn't meant to provide a
positive identification. It's meant to jog someone's memory," he said.
"The greatest value of the tool from an investigative perspective is
efficiency, the ability to exclude portions of the suspect pool."
In
the Brown County case, Hill said Riggs saw the sketch, went on the run for a
few days and then confessed to the killing in front of the congregation at the
church where he and Chantay both attended services. Hill had not said whether
DNA tests were run yet to see if Riggs' DNA matches that found at the scene.
No
attorney information was listed for Riggs, and his parents didn't return calls
seeking comment on the case.
In
Central Texas, Brazos County Sheriff Chris Kirk likened the skepticism about
the technology to officers saying digital cameras wouldn't hold up in court
when they were introduced because the photos could be manipulated.
"Now
every department in every state uses them," he said.
National
Geographic paired with Kirk's department earlier this year and paid the US$3,600
to submit suspect DNA from the 1981 slaying of Virginia Freeman for a sketch in
exchange for being able to film the search process. The department released a
sketch of the potential killer when he was in his 20s and another age
progressed to about 70.
"It
has definitely renewed the interest of the public in the case. We've gotten a
number of tips and phone calls," said Kirk, who is the only remaining
officer in his department who was around when Freeman was found bludgeoned,
strangled and stabbed to death. "That was a really traumatic crime for
that family, for the department and for the whole community."
As of this week, no arrests
had been made.
No comments:
Post a Comment