|
According
to official figures from the government’s Family Food report, the poorest 10
percent of the UK population – around 6.4 million people – aren’t eating enough
food to maintain their body weight.
The
report, published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
found that some 6.4 million people ate just 1,997 calories a day last year.
Guidelines stipulate that people should consume at least 2,080 calories to
maintain a healthy lifestyle, the Independent on Sunday reports.
“The
data absolutely shocked me. What it shows is for the first time since the
Second World War, if you are poor you cannot afford to eat sufficient
calories," said Chris Goodall, an award-winning
author who writes about energy.
However,
in the period after the Second World War, although there was rationing until
1954, many people grew their own vegetables and there wasn’t a culture of
low-in-nutrition fast and frozen foods.
He
also pointed out the widening gap in Britain between the rich and the poor. In
2001/2002, there was little difference between the amount of calories eaten by
the rich and the poor, with the richest 10 percent eating about 4 percent more
calories than the poorest. But by 2013 that had surged to 15 percent.
|
The
figures also showed that the poorest members of British society spent 22
percent more on food in 2013 than in 2007, while receiving 6.7 percent less
income.
The
figures are reflected by a surge in the number of people using food banks over
the last few years. The Trussell Trust, which runs more than 400 food banks
across the UK, fed more than 492,600 people between April and September, a 38
percent increase since 2013.
"We
talk to people who have had nothing but toast to eat for a week – usually
parents because they are trying their best to keep their children fed,"
Chris Mould, the chairman of the Trussell Trust, told the Independent.
Academics
advised treating the figures with caution as calorie intake is hard to measure.
They said there is no doubt more and more people are going hungry and eating
unhealthy diets.
“The
story of people struggling is now beginning to show up in national data sets
and that's a pretty bad sign. I think the numbers are quite a powerful marker
of the problem. The size and nature of the problem needs more work,"
Liz Dowler, a professor of food and social policy at Warwick University, told
the Independent.
She
also warned the children of poor families will bear the brunt of food poverty.
“Children who are malnourished cannot
concentrate at school, have endless coughs and colds and they get sick all the
time. It's a pretty negative existence,"
she said.
The
government maintained the figures were misleading.
"The
Family Food Report is an estimate of calories consumed in the home, not total
calorie intake. When estimated calorie consumption outside the home is included
the majority still meet their recommended daily intake,”
a government spokesman said.
Labour
claimed that, should they be voted into office in next May’s election, they
will tackle the problem resolutely.
“They
refuse to accept any responsibility for it, despite the fact that their [the
government] policies are making it worse," Maria Eagle, Labour’s shadow environment
secretary said.
"Only
by tackling the cost-of-living crisis can we begin to see the numbers of people
at risk of going hungry decline. That is why the next Labour government will
raise the minimum wage, ban exploitative zero-hour contracts and abolish the
bedroom tax," she said.
The Family Food report
looked at 6,000 households and also found that, apart from the poorest 10
percent, as a whole across the UK people were eating five percent more calories
than the required norm.
No comments:
Post a Comment