Professor
Dibu Ojerinde of JAMB
|
Prospective candidates
and their guardians have roundly rejected JAMB’s reasons for the JAMB’s
purported intention to re-distribute candidates to other universities. They argue that
university of choice is exclusively the decision of the candidates and their
sponsors, not JAMB who ought to be an impartial facilitator.
GRAPHITTI
NEWS gathers that there is a strong groundswell that the JAMB registrar appears
to be turning his office into a marketing arm of the Private University owners
in Nigeria. This surely would amount to gross act of impunity and partiality.
ThisDay
reports the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), University of Ibadan
chapter has kicked against the recent policy of redistribution of candidates
against their choice of institutions by the Joint Admission and Matriculation
Board (JAMB).
ThisDay report continues:
ASUU said JAMB had made the admission process chaotic and exposed candidates to fraudsters, adding that the examination body must respect candidates’ preferences and choices for tertiary institutions and consider security of lives of candidates, cost, proximity, quality, and rights of the Nigerian child in arriving at any policy.
ASUU said JAMB had made the admission process chaotic and exposed candidates to fraudsters, adding that the examination body must respect candidates’ preferences and choices for tertiary institutions and consider security of lives of candidates, cost, proximity, quality, and rights of the Nigerian child in arriving at any policy.
ASUU
therefore called on Nigerians to join in calling for the total scrapping of JAMB,
saying it has outlived its usefulness.
While
reacting to the recent policy, ASUU Chairman, University of Ibadan, Professor
Segun Ajiboye, described the policy as insensitive and exploitative of the
children of the poor, adding that it amounted to abuse of their fundamental
human rights of freedom of choice.
But
in a swift reaction, JAMB has further explained that the policy to
redistribute candidates who have cut-off marks less than what their
institutions of first choice required to needy institutions was done to assist
the candidates and their parents, noting that the ASUU UI chapter’s claim that
it was anti-poor was not true.
JAMB
also described the union’s claim that JAMB would make about N1 billion as
proceeds from candidates buying cards to check their redistribution status as
unfounded, noting that the checking is completely free and calling on parents
and candidates to check the Board’s website from Thursday, July 30, 2015,
for their names and institutions they are placed in.
ASUU
had lashed out at the Professor Dibu Ojerinde and JAMB Board for being so
insensitive to the plights of the Nigerian masses whose parents have not been
paid for months by some governors but are now being forced to pay N1,000 to
know where they are reassigned against their choices.
According
to Ajiboye, the University of Ibadan for instance, provides a level playing
ground for students who scored 200 and above in JAMB examination to compete for
the available spaces in the university.
“Candidates
choose universities considering quality, cost, proximity, courses of choice,
among others. Will Dibu Ojerinde pay for the fees so charged by the
institutions (including exorbitant fees in private and state universities)
where the candidates have been reassigned? If a candidate is reassigned from
Lagos to Ondo State, will Ojerinde foot the bill and expenses incurred and
incase of any accident. Who is JAMB protecting the candidates or their cronies
in other institutions? It has to go.”
“An
institution that asked candidates to make their choices of universities,
polytechnic and monotechnics has now turned back to impose tertiary
institutions on candidates and is demanding another N1000 to access
information. This JAMB has outlived its usefulness.”
But
a statement signed by JAMB’s Head of Media, Dr Fabian Benjamin, yesterday the
board explained “that the National cut-off marks of 180 for universities and
150 for Polytechnics, Colleges of Education and Innovative Enterprise
institutions in the 2015 UTME was a bench mark to set the tone for 2015
admission exercise.
“The board has
redistributed the other candidates who has cut-off marks less than what their
first choice required to needy institutions and we urge candidates and parent
to check the board’s website from Thursday, July 30, 2015 for their names
and institutions they are placed in and it’s free without paying any amount.
Please for purpose of clarity the checking is FREE.”
No comments:
Post a Comment