Geregu Power Plant |
The plans to review
electricity tariff has provoked customers of the distribution companies. The
Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC), the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties
(CNPP) and others are angry. The consumers warn against a price hike in the
face of a metering deficit, low investments in infrastructure and lingering
insufficient supply.
Should
the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) and the Presidency
approve the new tariffs being proposed by the Electricity Distribution
Companies (DISCOS) and Generation Companies (GENCOS), two options will be
opened to customers – to pay and depend on the firms for the utility or, find
alternative power source.
The
Nation report continues:
If
the plans are anything to go by, customers of the Abuja Electricity
Distribution Company (AEDC) will record 25 per increase, Benin Electricity
Distribution Company (BEDC) will have to contend with 21 per cent hike,
Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company (IEDC) have a marginal 1.76 per
cent increase to cope with. The Enugu Electricity Distribution Company (EEDC)
have 19.25per cent rise to bear. The commission’s Principal Manager, Market
Competition and Rates, Aisha Mahmud, dropped the hint at a presentation to
stakeholders in the sector, including the generating and distribution
companies, of the Consumer Forum and others last Tuesday at Abuja. There was no
information yet on what customers of Port Harcourt, Ikeja, Eko and other
companies will paying at the frozen point to allow a comparative analysis of
their new tariffs.
The
upward review in tariff is coming with some contrasts that could confuse
analysts to simply admit that NERC is doing electricity consumers the favour of
reducing the tariff. Truly, the commission had last year frozen the
tariff at a period that the customers were expected to pay more for electricity
following its bi-annual minor review. The Federal Government suspended the implementation
of the said tariff increases that would have been effective from July, barely
two months into President Muhammadu Buhari’s presidency.
NERC tinkers with tariff
But,
today, NERC is reviewing the tariff in accordance with its order. The baseline for
the new review is April 30, when power supply achieved marginal increase over
the output recorded in the last review that was not implemented.
Following
the surge in power supply in the period under review, the average cost of
electricity fell, necessitating customers to pay less. Although the tariff will
be lower than the one that was not implemented, it is still higher than what it
was when it was frozen last year – the price that is still effective. That the
new tariff will be effective retroactively from July this year shows that the
customers would pay arrears from July.
In
his opening remarks at the stakeholders’ consultation forum, NERC chairman Sam
Amadi noted that the public hearing was for a minor review of the few
indicators that the electricity market had to track. Dr. Amadi exonerated the
commission from the outcome of the review which he attributed to economic
fundamentals.
He
said: “Our job is to track them; we don’t manufacture them; we don’t create
them, but we track them to ensure that they are actually reflected in the
modem. We retrieve them from the official sources that are authorized by law.
So, whatever you see here know that we traced the macroeconomic data as they
develop over the months and feed them into our formula so that the outcome will
be clear to all. The chairman urged the consumers on active participation since
the burden will always fall on them. Amadi asked the advocacy network to help mobilize
consumers for participation in the public hearing.
Taking
the stakeholders through the procedures and variables the NERC adopted for the
review, Mahmud insisted that Section 76(8) of the Electric Power Sector Reform
Act conferred the powers for adoption of a tariff methodology, the Multi-Year
Tariff Order (MYTO).
The
MYTO, according to her, provides a 15-year tariff path for the
electricity industry, with minor reviews bi-annually in the light of changes in
a limited number of parameters (such as inflation, exchange rate, gas prices,
and generation capacity) and major reviews every five years, when all the
inputs are reviewed with the stakeholders.
But,
for this ongoing bi-annual review, Mahmud stressed that NERC obtained the data
on the official rate of inflation and exchange rate for the period ending April
30, 2015, from the website of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). It also
requested information on generation capacity as at April 30 from the System
Operator (SO) of the Transition Company of Nigeria (TCN) and also studied the
daily generation report of the SO. The commission requested for
information from the Nigeria Bulk Electricity Trader (NBET) on tested capacity
for all generators.
The
inflation rate that NERC received from the CBN, said Mahmud, shows a figure of
8.3 per cent as at April 30, but MYTO2 had an assumption of 13 per cent
inflation rate. Subsequently, after the 2014 minor review, the inflation rate
was reviewed down to 7.8 per cent.
On
exchange rate, she said that the data from the apex bank website shows an
exchange rate of ₦197 to US$1 as at April 30. MYTO-2 was benchmarked at the ₦178
to US$1, noting that MYTO-2 also allows a charge of one per cent above the CBN
rate to cover Letter of Credit and other bank charges. She said that the
adopted exchange rate for the review was therefore CBN’s exchange rate +1 per
cent which equals 198.97.
Mahmud
explained that gas prices had been regulated since the adoption of the MYTO in
2008 and the regulated prices were applied in the 2012-2016 price regime. She
added that the Federal Ministries of Petroleum Resources, Power, the CBN and
NERC reached an understanding in August last year on a gas price of US$2.50/mmbtu
and transport cost of US$0.80/mmbtu. There was a decision that the gas
transportation cost of US$0.30 should remain until the GENCOS prove otherwise
like the Geregu Power Plc., which stated in its gas transportation agreement
with US$.75.
In
terms of generation capacity, she noted that the system operator’s daily report
was used to derive the data which the commission adopted for the minor review.
She said that the average peak capacity is 3,832MW while average power sent out
capacity is 3,404MW.
On
the whole, a summary of the result of the minor review shows that inflation was
7.8 per cent when it was last amended in 2014. But, it hit 8.9 per cent in
April 2015. Exchange rate that was ₦166.18 when it was last
amended last year, soared to ₦198.97 in April. Gas price/mmbtu which was
US$2.80 during the last review in 2014 rose to US$2.80 in April this year.
Energy sent out from transmission stations that were 28,038Giga Watts/Hour (GW/h
last year, increased to 32,921GWh in April 2014. The revenue requirement which
was ₦572 billion during the last review surged to ₦619
billion April this year. Average retail tariff that was ₦26.2
in the last review dipped to ₦23.8 this April.
Consequent
upon the following parameters, NERC proposed that customers of the Abuja
Electricity Distribution Company will pay ₦18.41 as against the ₦14.70
they paying prior to the review. Had the commission implemented the tariff last
year, they would have paid N19.96.
Enugu
Electricity Distribution Company that froze R2 ₦16.44 will pay ₦19.61
in the new tariff but it ought to have paid N20.89 had NERC implemented the
last tariff.
Benin
Electricity Distribution Company that its R2 customers were paying ₦14.82
when the tariff was frozen will now pay ₦17.94 instead of ₦18.46.
Ibadan
Electricity Distribution Company that its R2 customers were paying ₦16.44
before it was frozen will now pay ₦16.73 instead of ₦18.00.
The
presentation was, however, silent on what other distribution companies such as
Jos, Yola, Port Harcourt, Eko, Ikeja and others were paying before their
tariffs were frozen to allow a comparative analysis. NERC is now taking
advantage of the differences between what customers would have paid last year
had it implemented the last tariff and the proposed tariff which is relatively
low to announce that it has reduced tariff. The same NERC seems to be reticent
on the fact that the customers will now not only pay higher, but also pay the
arrears of the increase with effect from July.
The NERC’s position
Rising
from the meeting, reporters asked Amadi to justify the increase and the
chairman said: “You made a good point, it was frozen. What that means is
that we did the analysis the other time, but going by the low level of
metering, going by the power supply, the DISCOS could forebear. We told them
that they are entitled to this tariff, but we are asking you not to collect it
at this stage until you improve.”
Many
DISCOS, according to him, did not take the intervention in good fate even
as it was clear that it was the global practice that regulators could freeze
the market in view of some socio-economic factors.
Amadi
stressed that it would have been completely irresponsible of the commission to
approve a tariff hike when a new administration was just assuming office in
June this year. But now, the stage is set for increase because the electricity
market is stable and needs to move on.
He
said: “Now, the order said six months. It will be unfrozen in June. June came
and I told you why it wasn’t done: because a new government just took over on
the 1st of June and that will be totally irresponsible to unlock tariff at that
stage. Now that we have some stability we need to move to the next stage.
And so, we have now shown what that should be. This is a formula. It has not
yet translated to anybody’s tariff. What the DISCOS will now do is to take this
short-fall. I will show you the new tariff, to see the short-fall. They will
put it into their modem and control it for 10 years.”
Unlike
the combative usual representatives of the distribution and generation
companies at previous NERC public hearings for tariff review, the meeting
penultimate Tuesday was very cordial. It was like an adoption of minutes
of a previously held meeting because the review serves the interest of the
operators.
Speaking,
the Executive Director, Regulation, Abuja Electricity Distribution Company
(AEDC), Abimbola Odubiyi, drew attention to the fact that “NBET has already
activated the PPA for Olurunsogo and Omotosho, which they are giving us currently.
And that is not reflected in the tariff.”
He
overlooked the hike as it has favoured his company.
Representative
of the Geregu Power Plc., Adebiyi Adenuga, urged the commission to consider the
fact that all their commitments are in naira which the exchange rate has
affected adversely. He asked the NERC to allow the tariff to address the firm’s
loses in the past for the period of arrears the retroactivity of the tariff
will cover.
However,
some of the consumers at the meeting complained that the distribution companies
take advantage of the metering deficit in the market to charge them even when
there is little or no power supply.
Speaking, the Mr. Oboma
Ekoh of Nigeria Electricity Consumer Advocacy Network (NECAN), noted: “Abuja
Electricity Distribution Company is shortchanging consumers particularly in the
rural areas. For instance, your tariff before this time was ₦14.70.
And you go to the rural areas in place of R2 you give them C1, you give them
A1. I am so sorry I will present you with bills because we have been conducting
a research on this. I have collected samples of bills and there is a particular
location in Abuja for which I have about 12 bills. In the R2 you collected ₦248
kilowatts per hour per month. And you billed at ₦14.70. You go back to
people who have not had electricity for an upward of eight months since January
and you billed them ₦4, 000 and you gave them
415kilo watts per hour. The next month you billed them 475 kilo watts per hour.
The next month 466, the next month 415. And these billings, within this period
there was no light. There was no distribution transformer in those areas. Now,
listen to what you people do in the field. They give you a bill of ₦30,000
and ask you how much you are going to pay. You tell them instead of ₦30,000
you have to pay N10,000. What are the parameters?
No comments:
Post a Comment