The International Olympic
Committee has rejected calls for a blanket ban on Russia at the Rio 2016 Games,
ruling that individual sports federations should decide whether Russian
athletes are eligible to compete.
RT
News report continues:
Athletes
will need to meet strict criteria laid out by the IOC, including proving to
international federations that they have a clean doping record and have been
tested by “reliable” international anti-doping bodies.
Any
athletes with a proven doping history will not be allowed to compete at the Games,
even if they have served their sanctions.
The
ruling gives a glimmer of hope to Russian athletes who have not been tarnished
by the recent doping scandal engulfing the country, although they will face a
race against time to prove they are clean before the Games begin in Rio on
August 5.
In
addition, the IOC’s ruling states that, “The entry of any Russian athlete
ultimately accepted by the IOC will be subject to a rigorous additional
out-of-competition testing programme in coordination with the relevant IF
[International Federation] and WADA [the World Anti-Doping Agency]."
The
decision comes shortly after the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) published a
report by Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren, which accused the Russian government
of having a system that allegedly shielded doping athletes from being caught.
The
report claimed that Russian intelligence officers used an unidentified method
to tamper with urine samples while sport officials selected athletes who would
be shielded by such interventions. It also alleged that the Russian anti-doping
laboratory had been employed to participate in the system rather than fight
doping.
On
Thursday, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne rejected a plea
from Russian track and field athletes to overturn a competition ban imposed on
them by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF).
The ban was issued
provisionally in November over doping allegations against Russia and was upheld
last month, as the IAAF said Russia was not doing enough to address the issue.
No comments:
Post a Comment