President Muhammadu Buhari |
The suspension of the
tenure policy for top federal officials won’t be reversed the government said
yesterday.
Daily
Trust report continues:
Late
President Umaru Yar’adua’s government introduced the policy in August, 2009
reportedly to eliminate stagnation in the service.
The
policy prescribed a term limit of four years for permanent secretaries and
another four years (renewable once) for officers on directorate cadre.
However,
the federal government suspended the policy on June 20, 2016 saying it had
served its purpose.
The
suspension was criticized by the proponents of the policy and some public
servants who said they have been put at a disadvantage because many directorate
staff who are due for retirement will now stay on.
But
the government in a letter responding to Daily Trust’s request under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) said the suspension stays because it was done
to strengthen the bureaucracy.
The
response was made in a letter dated July 26, 2016 and signed by Haruna Imrana
Yazid, a director of communications in the Office of Head of Service of the
Federation (OHSF).
The letter said: “The government is reviewing the policy, along with other policies, in an effort to institute relevant and far reaching changes to strengthen the civil service.
The letter said: “The government is reviewing the policy, along with other policies, in an effort to institute relevant and far reaching changes to strengthen the civil service.
“We
wish to reiterate that just like any policy of government, policies are
supposed to be reviewed from time to time to find out if they have met the
desired objectives.
“The
aim of this administration in the review of the policy and others for the
service is to create a strong, dedicated and effective professional civil
service that will propel the development of the nation and also stand global
challenges.”
However,
two top retired bureaucrats in an interview with Daily Trust hold divergent
views about the reversal of the policy.
Tenure removal will
deepen corruption – Adegoroye
Dr
Goke Adegoroye, retired pioneer Director General/Permanent Secretary of the
Bureau of Public Service Reforms (BPSR) told Daily Trust in Abuja yesterday
that the tenure policy reversal will pave way for “ridiculous situations where
assistant and deputy directors will end up retiring before their directors.”
He
said: “We should find it curious that President Muhammadu Buhari has suspended
the tenure policy which means a reversal of the gains made so far.”
Dr.
Adegoroye, who is the spokesperson of the Council of Retired Federal Permanent
Secretaries (CORFEPS), said “the first obvious implication of the suspension is
that it would reverse the gains made since the policy was introduced, as
highlighted above.
“The
second effect is that the suspension would exacerbate the heinous act of
records falsification currently permeating the service.
“This
is because, unlike regular officers who, by their record of entering the
service at 25 years of age and spending 27 years to attain the grade of
director, would have their eight -year tenure on GL 17 co-terminate with their
60 years of age.
“Most
of the officers with potentials to spend more than eight years without
attaining 60 years of age are those who transferred to the civil service
mid-stream in their careers.
“Since their previous records of service were not known, they are able to manipulate those records to enable them stay well below the retirement age ceiling. “Such manipulation of record would compound not just the crisis of succession in the service but also the wage bill of government, as it loads the service at the top at the expense of renewal at the lower levels,” he said.
“Since their previous records of service were not known, they are able to manipulate those records to enable them stay well below the retirement age ceiling. “Such manipulation of record would compound not just the crisis of succession in the service but also the wage bill of government, as it loads the service at the top at the expense of renewal at the lower levels,” he said.
He
said the reversal “would compound the already festering problems arising from
the selective recruitment into GL 16 and 17 positions, carried out by the FCSC
in 2013 and 2014.
“These
exercises have now created a new generation of civil servants on the grade of
director in their late 30s and early 40s who are poised to spend another 20
years on those grade levels. Most of the officers were from states in the
southern part of the country, especially the South-South geo-political zone.
“Their
entry into the civil service has been to the detriment of the hardworking,
committed and loyal civil servants with not less than 25 years cognate
experience within the federal service system.
“The
fact that these officers were brought into the service, using the consequential
vacancies which those waiting in line had expected would be available for their
own promotion, was one of the main issues that led the GL 16 officers to take
the FCSC to court in 2015.
“The
removal of tenure would indeed perpetuate this group of officers and the
service would be back to status quo ante.”
He
said the way forward is for the president to set up a panel to examine the
tenure policy in all its ramifications; address the current shortcomings; and
make appropriate recommendations to safeguard the effective implementation of
the policy within the overarching national strategy of public service renewal
and revitalization.
Tenure policy breeds
corruption
However,
a former permanent secretary, who preferred anonymity because the sensitivity
of the issue, told Daily Trust the tenure system contributed to the
degeneration of the country’s public service.
“The
removal of tenure system is good because it is at the heart of the degeneration
of the public service. In fact, if I’m to be the president, I will ask the
Federal Civil Service Commission and the Head of Service of the Federation to
audit all promotions and appointments that were made from 2011 to date,
particularly at the senior levels.
“Emphasis should be from level 13 to 17. This is the way you will weed out a lot of wrong appointments made outside the guidelines. If the government is serious about the civil service, repealing tenure system is not enough, they have to overhaul the entire system completely.
“Emphasis should be from level 13 to 17. This is the way you will weed out a lot of wrong appointments made outside the guidelines. If the government is serious about the civil service, repealing tenure system is not enough, they have to overhaul the entire system completely.
“Honestly,
Buhari will not go anywhere in his attempt to reform public institutions, unless
he overhauls and reforms public service,” he said.
He
said the tenure system was discredited even during the previous administration,
saying “former president Goodluck Jonathan admitted that the tenure system was
causing massive attrition of the best hands in the public service. It was
destroying the public service because competent and capable hands were
removed.”
The
former bureaucrat, who served in various ministries, said the tenure system was
the worst policy initiative ever introduced in the public service.
“It
offended the principle of competence and merit. It removed the best hands
systematically and allowed people who were worst to occupy offices. It
introduced mediocrity and as soon as people took offices either as permanent
secretaries or directors, they began to be corrupt themselves because they knew
they had maximum of four years,” he said.
He
added that the tenure system breached the fundamental contract between the
civil servant and the country which stipulated that a civil servant should
retire after putting 35 years in the service or attaining 60 years of age.
Civil
servants kick
Top
civil servants at the Federal Secretariat Abuja who declined being named for
fear of victimization told Daily Trust that the president was either deceived
or blackmailed into agreeing to the tenure policy reversal.
An
assistant director said they fear the consequence of this policy would be worse
than the scenario that led to the introduction of the policy.
“We
all know that even with the tenure policy in place, the corrupt tendencies of
those at the top echelon of the bureaucracy did not make the benefits of the
policy much felt.
“How do competent and experienced hands rise to higher levels especially director when those that were there refused to let go until they reach 60 years of age or 35 years in service,” one of the workers said.
“How do competent and experienced hands rise to higher levels especially director when those that were there refused to let go until they reach 60 years of age or 35 years in service,” one of the workers said.
Another civil servant said the politicization in the federal civil service that led to the rapid promotion of some officers and the appointment of those on secondment from states before it was stopped would take its toll on the service.
No comments:
Post a Comment