©
Paresh. Source: http://www.truthdig.com/images/cartoonuploads/fifa_500.jpg
|
FIFA
cleared Russia and Qatar on Thursday of wrongdoing in their bids to host the
World Cup, but the former U.S. prosecutor who led the investigation by soccer's
governing body said it had misrepresented his findings.
According to Reuters, a
German judge who ruled on behalf of the soccer body's ethics committee said he
found no grounds sufficient to re-open the bidding process for the 2018 cup in
Russia and the 2022 cup in Qatar.
But
former U.S. attorney Michael Garcia, hired by FIFA to head an investigation
into the bids that lasted more than a year, said he would appeal against the
committee's conclusion.
"Today's
decision by the chairman of the adjudicatory chamber contains numerous
materially incomplete and erroneous representations of the facts and
conclusions detailed in the investigatory chamber's report," said Garcia,
who will take his case to another FIFA department, the appeals committee.
FIFA
and Qatar World Cup organizers have been fending off allegations of corruption
ever since the tiny Gulf state was awarded the 2022 tournament. Qatar has
little domestic soccer tradition and its desert climate is widely seen as too
hot for the game to be played in summer when the cup is normally staged.
Qatar
has also been criticized over its treatment of migrant workers in the
construction industry. It denies any wrongdoing and says it would be good for
the world's most popular sporting event to have it staged in the soccer-mad
Middle East.
Russia
was awarded the 2018 cup on the same day in a dual bidding process that ended
in 2010.
Garcia
was hired by FIFA and spent more than a year combing through allegations of
bribes paid and favours given to the international soccer officials who made
the decisions, not just by the winning countries but by other bidders as well.
But
instead of issuing his own report, he presented his findings to FIFA, which
issued its own ruling. Garcia did not give any further details about the errors
he said had been made in the summary of his findings, delivered by ethics
committee chief adjudicator Hans-Joachim Eckert.
Eckert,
for his part, ruled that any improprieties uncovered by Garcia were too minor
to require new bidding.
"The
effects of these occurrences on the bidding process as a whole were far from
reaching any threshold that would require returning to the bidding process, let
alone reopening it," Eckert's statement said.
"The
assessment of the 2018/2022 FIFA World Cups bidding process is therefore closed
for the FIFA Ethics Committee."
FIFA
welcomed Eckert's report and said it was looking forward to continuing the
preparations for Russia 2018 and Qatar 2022, "which are already well
underway".
CORRUPTION ACCUSATIONS
Accusations
of corruption at FIFA have been widespread, notably in media in Britain after
England was one of the countries to lose the 2018 bid to Russia.
England's
own bid came under criticism from Eckert for "an apparent violation of
bidding rules" in its relations with FIFA power broker Jack Warner, then
the head of soccer in North America and the Caribbean.
Eckert
also raised questions over people connected with the bids of Qatar, Australia
and South Korea.
In
the case of Qatar, the statement said "there are certain indications of
potentially problematic conduct of specific individuals in the light of
relevant FIFA Ethics rules".
However,
it said that the Qatar bidding team had only a "distant" relationship
to former Asian Football Confederation president Mohamed bin Hammam, a Qatari
who has since been banned for life from football by FIFA, which accused him of
paying bribes, charges he denied.
Qatar
has always maintained that bin Hammam played no part in its bid.
Eckert's
report said that it could not find any evidence of misconduct from the Russian
bid, although it added that not all records had been available.
The
statement added that Garcia intended to open formal investigations against
individuals who were not named.
Eckert's
statement praised FIFA's president, Sepp Blatter, for implementing
"critical" reforms "including those that made this inquiry
possible".
It
concluded that "the line between a bid team's conduct... and improper
conduct is a very fine one. From which point on lobbyism must be considered as
improper conduct is, for example, not always clear."
No comments:
Post a Comment