US Secretary of State
John Kerry and his British counterpart Philip Hammond Monday voiced fears over
possible political interference in Nigeria's vote count, as the country awaited
the results of weekend elections.
"We have seen no
evidence of systemic manipulation of the process. But there are disturbing
indications that the collation process -- where the votes are finally counted
-- may be subject to deliberate political interference," the two diplomats
said in a joint statement.
Nigeria's Independent
National Electoral Commission flatly rejected that.
"There is
absolutely no basis for that at all," commission spokesman Kayode Idowu
told AFP.
"There is no
interference at all. We are about to start the collation process. We have no
evidence of political interference," he added.
Britain and the United
States meanwhile welcomed "the largely peaceful vote" after it was
pushed into a second day Sunday due to failures in new technology designed to
read biometric identity cards. The cards were introduced to combat electoral
fraud.
But Kerry and Hammond
warned that any attempt at fraud "would contravene the letter and spirit
of the Abuja accord, to which both major parties committed themselves."
They added that their
governments "would be very concerned by any attempts to undermine the
independence" of the electoral commission.
Nigeria's presidential
election pitting President Goodluck Jonathan against former military ruler
Muhammadu Buhari is the closest in Nigeria's history, and first to present a
credible opposition challenge.
The vote is being
closely watched amid fears of a repeat of the post-electoral violence of the
last presidential poll four years ago.
Some 1,000 people were
killed after Jonathan beat Buhari to the presidency in 2011, when the
opposition alleged widespread rigging.
International election
observers have given broadly positive reactions to the conduct of the weekend's
vote, despite late delivery of election materials and technical glitches with
new voter authentication devices.
But Nigeria's
Transition Monitoring Group, which had observers across the country, said:
"These issues did not systematically disadvantage any candidate or
party."
Santiago Fisas, head of
the European Union election observer mission, also told reporters "there
is not evidence of a systematic subversion of the voting process so far."
But he stressed that
"collation is the most critical problem... We are watching this."
No comments:
Post a Comment