|
For the first time in
history, the Queen could face industrial action among disgruntled palace staff.
Workers at one of the royal family’s most iconic residences, Windsor Castle,
are preparing to ballot in a dispute over pay.
The Public and Commercial Services union (PCS)
confirmed more than 100 of the lowest-paid workers at Windsor Castle are due to
be balloted from Tuesday, and will decide whether to take non-strike action in
a dispute over pay.
RT.com reports:
The ballot announcement
came as the Queen prepared to meet Prime Minister David Cameron to formally
dissolve parliament before the May 7 general election.
PCS have said staff at
the palace, where starting salaries are as little as £14,400 per year, receive
less than the living wage and have suffered years of pay restraint.
The union has proposed
non-strike measures involving the withdrawal of “goodwill” measures,
such as giving tours to paying visitors of the castle.
The initial dispute
over pay began in 2014, when staff at the palace accepted what the union said
was an “unsatisfactory” pay offer in the knowledge that allowances for
duties such as giving tours would be considered during the coming year.
The union decided to
ballot for industrial action after it was revealed the allowances would not be
allocated.
If PCS members vote in
favor of action, it will take place in the week before the general election.
Mark Serwotka, the PCS
general secretary, called the royal family’s treatment of workers “scandalous.”
“These workers are loyal to their employer and absolutely committed to
ensuring visitors are given the royal treatment,” he said. “It is scandalous
that staff are so appallingly paid and expected to do work for free that brings
in money for the royal family.”
A spokesperson for the
union said it was a coincidence that the action could take place so close to
the general election, but added that the timing was “nonetheless welcome if it helps to put some added focus on how badly
paid royal household staff are.”
Campaigners for
Republic, a group which advocates an elected head of state, have criticized the
behavior of the Queen.
Graham Smith, chief
executive of the campaign, called the situation a “failure of leadership.”
“It is a failure of leadership on the part of the Queen that despite
receiving close to £300 million a year in public subsidy, she continues to pay
staff so badly,” he said. “The Queen as head of state has a responsibility to
set a higher standard, to lead by example. Paying hard-working staff such low
wages, while expecting them to do so much more than their jobs demand, shows an
appalling contempt.”
Smith further said the
fact that staff are paid so poorly was exploitative.
“It is typical of the royals that they
continue to demand more money for themselves, spending millions on refurbishing
their homes, yet they exploit the goodwill of those ordinary hard-working
people that keep the palaces running.”
Voting in the ballot for
industrial action continues until April 14.
No comments:
Post a Comment