Nakiwala
Hasifa with a picture she says is of her son, who is now in the US. Photograph:
Amy Fallon/Guardian
|
Ugandan families have been bribed,
tricked or coerced into giving up their children to U.S. citizens and other
foreigners for adoption, a Thomson Reuters Foundation investigation has found.
Leaked
documents, court data and a series of exclusive interviews with officials,
whistleblowers, victims and prospective adoptive parents has revealed:
- a culture of corruption in which children's birth histories are at times manipulated to make them appear as orphans when they are not
- a lucrative industry in which lawyers acting on behalf of foreign applicants receive large payments
- a mushrooming network of unregistered childcare institutions through which children are primed for adoption
- an absence of reliable court data to counteract allegations of negligence or fraud by probation officers involved in the adoption process
Across
Uganda church-backed orphanages and private child care institutions are
springing up.
Reuters report continues:
"Fifteen
years ago there were just two dozen orphanages, now there are as many as 400
such institutions," said Stella Ayo-Odongo, executive director of the
Uganda Child Rights NGO Network.
"But
this is steeped in problems. Intercountry adoptions constitute a booming
industry in which child traffickers are profiteering," she said.
According
to Ugandan law, foreigners are required to spend at least three years in the
country before adopting, but they can acquire a legal guardianship days after
arriving and complete the process back home.
Data
from the U.S. State Department shows that 201 children were adopted from Uganda
by U.S. citizens in 2013/2014, making it the third biggest source country in
Africa. In all, Americans adopted 6,441 children from around the world last
year.
Uganda's
parliament is expected to pass tighter legislation that would ban legal
guardianships, with a view to signing an international treaty, the Hague
Adoption Convention, but corruption and bureaucracy have stalled the process,
critics say.
Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) and Ethiopia, two of the biggest source countries for
adopted African children last year, have taken steps to restrict overseas
applications.
"Uganda
must ratify the Hague Adoption Convention urgently," said Ayo-Odongo.
"It was previously not an issue, but now, with levels of child trafficking
at such a high level, it should be a priority."
Ugandan
children regularly pass through Kampala's Entebbe international airport.
On
a given day they can be seen hand-in-hand with white adoptive parents at the
departure gate.
Many
of these adoptions will lead to successful unions between the child and his or
her adoptive parents.
But
others will never make it this far.
In
Uganda, a lack of available documents makes it impossible to determine how many
adoptions involve fraud, but four government officials told the Thomson Reuters
Foundation the problem was widespread.
"Some
lawyers lie about the birth history of the child," said Stella Ogwang, an
official in the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development, which
oversees child welfare.
Another
senior government official, who did not want to be named, described Uganda's
adoption system as "a racket".
One
of the lawyers known for handling intercountry adoption cases denied
involvement in fraud, saying that the cases she handled involved orphans
abandoned by their families.
Another
lawyer, Peter Nyombi, said he was not aware of any fraud in the adoption cases
he handled.
"We
carry out extensive investigations into the background of the children,"
said Nyombi, who is a former attorney general.
BIRTH HISTORY
Data
shows that a large proportion of the children put forward for adoption have
surviving relatives.
A
leaked study into foreign adoptions in Uganda, overseen by the Ministry of
Gender, Labour and Social Development, found only a fifth of all adopted
children it surveyed were orphans who had lost both parents.
The
report, funded by the U.N. children's agency, UNICEF and yet to be published,
also found that biological parents and relatives gave up their children in the
belief they would receive financial incentives from adoptive parents and
children's homes.
Many
of them, the report finds, come to learn that their child's identity has been
changed fraudulently while in the institution, without their knowledge.
The
report's author, Hope Among, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation that securing
access to court files took several months and certain files were withheld by
the judiciary.
A
court registrar, Muse Musimbi, declined to say why this was the case and said
he could only discuss the matter with the court files in front of him.
"Before
an application [for guardianship] comes to court, the child's identity may have
been changed several times by the lawyers or those acting for them in the child
care institutions," said the Ministry of Gender and Labour's Ogwang.
Intercountry
adoption is widely believed to be a lucrative business. Officials estimate a
Ugandan lawyer can earn $30,000 during the adoption process.
Two
lawyers involved in the process refused to comment on their earnings. Another
lawyer, who did not want to be named, said he earns $4,000 for each case he
handles.
Peter
Nyombi said he earned less than $10,000 per legal guardianship.
"Thirty
thousand dollars? I would be a very rich man if I were charging that
amount," said Nyombi, laughing.
Uganda's
per capita GNI (Gross National Income) was $600 in 2013, according to the World
Bank, well below the average for sub-Saharan Africa.
'FRAUD'
A
former High Court registrar said that some probation officers, on instruction
from lawyers, were in the habit of fraudulently copying and pasting information
from old documents to ensure the application would be rubber stamped.
"Some
of our lawyers have gone to the extent of confusing parents and relatives of
the victims to present forged information. They tell the parents to lie, to
pretend to be dead, in return for small payments," said Moses Binonga,
coordinator of the anti-human trafficking task force at Uganda's Interior
Ministry.
The
task of protecting children is made harder by the high levels of deprivation.
Twenty-four
percent of Ugandan children under five live in extreme poverty, according to a
2014 UNICEF report.
One
lawyer involved in the adoption process said this makes determining a child's
origins all the harder.
"Many
of the children who are the subject of guardianship come from very
disadvantaged backgrounds ... where members of the family may not be educated
and have records on the dates of birth or death of a parent," said the
lawyer, who did not want to be named.
Staff
at some of Kampala's child care institutions told the Thomson Reuters
Foundation that many of the children are abandoned by poor family members who
say they can no longer afford to care for them.
It
was in one children's home that a former social worker, who wishes to remain
anonymous, first encountered what he believes was fraud.
He
lost his job after accusing colleagues of falsifying documents in the files of
three children.
"It
was the job of the social worker to document the background of a child,"
he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
"Sometimes
my colleagues would change those files, so that the children could be sent out
[for adoption by foreigners]."
On
one occasion the social worker said he noticed paperwork showing that the three
children had surviving biological parents or relatives. He believes the
documents were removed while his back was turned.
"When
I got back from holiday, the three children were gone," he said.
The
former employee said he tried to raise the alarm.
"The
probation officers told me it was too late to intervene. That was when I
realised I had made enemies inside the orphanage," he said.
'TRAFFICKING'
Moses
Binonga, from the anti-trafficking task force, said corruption in the adoption
system is widespread, but believes the American system is at fault.
"There
are cases where we have discovered fraud in the adoption process. When we have
complained to the U.S. government they have not returned those children [from
America]; they say they are American citizens and cannot be brought back,"
Binonga said.
"It
makes us think there is a hidden agenda. The Americans are quiet on this,"
he said, adding that the current system exposes children to child trafficking.
An
official from the U.S. State Department said this was an "imprecise and
misleading" description, because trafficking involved "intent to
ultimately exploit the victim."
But
campaigners also point to a lack of transparency or follow-up of cases of
intercountry adoptions which do not work out.
U.S.
government figures for 2013/2014 show 91 out of 6,441 children adopted from
overseas were abandoned or relinquished by their adoptive parents in America,
ending up in state custody.
The
Dutch government suspended intercountry adoptions from Uganda in 2012, because
of what it perceived to be a lack of transparency in the procedure.
The
U.S. State Department said it is not considering a ban on intercountry
adoptions from Uganda.
"The
Department of State believes intercountry adoption can provide permanent,
loving homes to children in need when children cannot be cared for in their
country of birth," the State Department official said.
U.S. AGENCIES
More
than 200 U.S.-based adoption agencies, of which a number work in Uganda, assist
American applicants to complete adoptions in their home state, but in a number
of cases, the process stalls.
"America's
regulatory approach has proven short-sighted, for the failure to provide
sufficient safeguards has created a system designed and destined to fail,"
says David Smolin, Professor of Law at Samford University, Alabama.
"Under
this 'slash and burn adoption' ... too many adoption agencies with too much
money to spend descend upon vulnerable developing nations, leading to abusive
practices, corruption, scandals, and then closures," Smolin said.
He
speaks from experience.
Smolin
adopted two girls from India in 1998 only to find they had been kidnapped by an
orphanage and their mother was searching for them.
He
says the problem is perpetuated by the fact that "adoptive parents are
sometimes reluctant to report abusive practices to the State Department, based
on fears of their agency, peer pressure from the adoption community, and fears
that the child might be forcibly sent back".
Adoption
agencies take a different view.
"Legal
guardianships are recognised by the United States, they are recognized by its
embassy in Uganda, so we are thinking if there is an opportunity to save the
children, we can," said Tendai Masiriri, vice president, Bethany Christian
Services adoption agency, which has operated in Uganda since 2011.
"Children
are suffering in orphanages, right?" he said.
Those
involved in Uganda's child welfare reforms blame the orphanages for what they
see as their failure to investigate cases.
"Orphanages
have their own agenda. They make up stories about children and cannot always
verify information because they are not involved from the outset," said
Ogwang of the Gender and Labour Ministry.
Ogwang,
an opponent of intercountry adoptions, believes the state shares responsibility
for what she sees as deep seated corruption.
"The
problem is with the system, you cannot blame the biological parents."
No comments:
Post a Comment