|
The family of Jean Charles de Menezes will challenge the
decision not to bring charges over his death at the European Court of Human
Rights (ECHR) today.
Relatives of the
Brazilian will take their case to the Strasbourg court's Grand Chamber almost
10 years after he was mistaken for a suicide bomber and shot dead by police
marksmen on a London Tube train.
Lawyers for the family
argue that the assessment used by prosecutors in deciding that no individual
should be charged over the 2005 shooting is incompatible with Article 2 of the
European Convention on Human Rights, which covers the right to life.
Press Association reports:
They claim the evidential
test applied by the Crown Prosecution Service - that there should be sufficient
evidence for a "realistic prospect" of conviction - is too high a
threshold.
It means that, in effect,
the decision not to bring a prosecution was based on a conclusion that there
was less than a 50% chance of conviction, they say.
The case has been lodged
by Patricia da Silva, a cousin of Mr de Menezes.
She said: "For 10
years our family has been campaigning for justice for Jean because we believe
that police officers should have been held to account for his killing. Jean's
death is a pain that never goes away for us.
"Nothing can bring
him back but we hope that this legal challenge will change the law so that no
other family has to face what we did."
Mr de Menezes, 27, was
shot dead by Metropolitan Police firearms officers at Stockwell Underground station
in south London on July 22 2005.
The following year the
CPS announced that no individual should be charged.
In 2007 the Met was fined
£175,000 after being convicted of breaching health and safety laws.
An inquest jury later
rejected the police account of the shooting and returned an open verdict. The
coroner had already ruled out a verdict of unlawful killing.
In 2009, the family of
the electrician agreed an undisclosed settlement with Scotland Yard.
Today's hearing comes
more than seven years after the original application was lodged at the ECHR.
The claim is also challenging the definition of self-defence.
Harriet Wistrich, a
solicitor representing the family, said: "The officers who shot Jean
Charles have a defence if they had an honest belief that they were under
imminent threat, even if they were mistaken and their mistake was wholly
unreasonable."
Judgment is expected to be
reserved. The CPS declined to comment ahead of the hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment