Israelis and Palestinians would gain billions of dollars from
making peace with each other while both would face daunting economic losses in
case of other alternatives, particularly in case of a return to violence,
according to a new study released on Monday.
The RAND Corp. nonprofit
research organization published a new study Monday, June 8, 2015, indicating
that Israelis and Palestinians would gain billions of dollars from peace. The
findings are in line with long-time arguments that peace is in the economic
interest of both sides.
AP report continues:
The RAND Corp., a
U.S.-based nonprofit research organization, interviewed some 200 officials from
the region and elsewhere during more than two years of research into the costs
of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Its main finding was that following a
peace agreement, Israelis stood to gain US$120 billion over the course of a
decade. The Palestinians would gain $50 billion, marking a 36-percent rise in
their average per-capita income, the report said.
In contrast, the Israeli
economy would lose some US$250 billion in foregone economic opportunities in a
return to violence, and the Palestinians would see their per-capita gross
domestic product fall by as much as 46 percent, the report said.
The findings are in line
with long-time arguments that peace is in the economic interest of both sides.
"We hope our
analysis and tools can help Israelis, Palestinians and the international
community understand more clearly how present trends are evolving and recognize
the costs and benefits of alternatives to the current destructive cycle of
action, reaction and inaction," said C. Ross Anthony, co-leader of the
study and director of RAND's Israeli-Palestinian Initiative.
The study looked into
five different scenarios: a two-state solution, a coordinated unilateral withdrawal,
an uncoordinated unilateral withdrawal, nonviolent resistance and a violent
uprising. Not surprisingly, the economic benefit for both sides dropped
considerably in each of alternative down the ladder.
Some of the elements of
the nonviolent resistance scenario are already unfolding with Palestinians
taking actions to put economic and international pressure on Israel. The study
found that Israelis could lose US$80 billion and Palestinians could lose US$12
billion relative to current trends. But compared with a two-state solution,
losses from the non-violent resistance scenario become even more dramatic:
about US$200 billion for the Israelis and US$60 billion for the Palestinians.
RAND teams are currently
in the region, presenting their findings to both Israeli and Palestinians
officials. The study was funded by an independent donor and the think tank
insisted it was not advocating, just providing tools for leaders to make good
decisions.
In reaching their
conclusions, researchers devised a "cost-of-conflict calculator" that
factored in issues like Israel's defense budget, its trade relations and what
it would cost to relocate West Bank settlers. For Palestinians, variable costs
included potential destruction of property, freedom of movement and banking
regulations.
The Palestinians seek the
West Bank and Gaza Strip as part of their future state, yet numerous rounds of
peace talks have been unsuccessful.
"A two-state
solution produces by far the best economic outcomes for both Israelis and
Palestinians," said Charles Ries, co-leader of the study and an executive
at RAND. "In a decade, the average Israeli would see his or her income
rise by about US$2,200, versus a US$1,000 gain for Palestinians, compared with
our projection for present trends. But that only works out to 5 percent for
each Israeli versus 36 percent for the average Palestinian, meaning Israelis
have far less and Palestinians far more economic incentive to move toward
peace."
RAND spokesman Jeffrey
Hiday said copies of the study had been sent to officials on both sides of the
conflict, including the Israeli prime minister's office and Foreign Ministry
and the Palestinian Finance Ministry.
Israeli officials declined
comment, while Palestinian officials could not immediately be reached for
comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment