Wole Soyinka
|
Nobel Laureate and
foremost social critic, Wole Soyinka, is of the opinion that Nigerians
of Igbo extraction are the only people in the country who can be predicted
accurately.
Delivering a lecture
titled ‘Predicting Nigeria, Electoral Ironies’ at the Harvard University
Hutchins Centre for African & African American Research, in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, USA, the revered scholar described people from that part of the
country as “greedy”.
“Igbos remained
unrepentant and resolute towards their strategic objective of secession at
worst; or a Nigerian president of Igbo extraction at best,” he said at the
lecture, which held on April 29.
TheCable report continues:
“The climax of MASSOB’s
war against the Nigerian state was the call for sit-ins and civil disobedience
that shut down markets and public services, as Igbos stayed at home in a
symbolic gesture to assert Biafran independence. The call was honoured by
governors in the two principal Ibo states, though without fanfare.
“The Igbos are probably
the only group of Nigerians that you can predict with great accuracy whom they
will vote for in an election, because they tend to put their votes where their
stomachs take them; suffering as it were, from incurable money-mindedness, as
they would stop at nothing in their quest for personal financial gain.”
Commenting on the result
of Nigeria’s presidential election, Soyinka said the re-election of President
Goodluck Jonathan would have been “disastrous”, as Muhammadu Buhari,
Nigeria’s president-elect, is better option.
“Muhammadu Buhari was the
better of the two evils as the incumbent president Goodluck Jonathan had been
an unmitigated disaster and failure,” he said.
“It was a painful
decision to tell people to vote Buhari, but the country needed a new beginning.
I was more against Jonathan, than I was pro-Buhari.
“Nothing is more unworthy
of leadership than to degrade a system by which one attains fulfillment, and
this is what the nation witnessed time and time again under Jonathan, who was
increasingly becoming intolerant of opposition in an escalating streak of
impunity and authoritarian madness, which was most blatant and unconscionable.
“The ‘militricians’ –
soldiers turned politicians in power – aren’t looking for excellence; their
civilian cohorts are worse. Short cuts and how to circumvent the system for the
profit of a few are the norm of governance. Those who do honest work are
derided as lacking the skill to fit it. Ironically, things haven’t quite
changed a bit after 16 years of democracy in the country.”
No comments:
Post a Comment