Professor Wole Soyinka |
A former Senator, Chris Anyanwu, has said
that the Nobel laureate, Wole Soyinka’s criticism of the Sexual Offences Bill
was based on his lack of knowledge about the bill.
In
an open letter addressed to Mr. Soyinka, Sunday, Mrs. Anyanwu said when
implemented, the bill would mitigate the sufferings of parents by reducing
their fear of what happens to their children in their absence – at schools, in
the play grounds, in the neighbourhoods, and in religious spaces.
“You
have been misled by the misinformation circulated by someone who could not read
or comprehend a legal draft; someone who did not have the patience to read
through a proposal, see what was recommended and what was finally accepted,”
Mrs. Anyanwu, who represented Imo East in the 7th Assembly, said in the letter.
PREMIUM TIMES report continues:
“You
were misled by someone who deliberately distorted the content of one of the
most profound bills ever passed by the Nigerian legislature, scandalized the
proponent and the institution for reasons that you and I may not know.”
Mr.
Soyinka had, on Friday, urged President Muhammadu Buhari to withhold his assent
to the bill (which is also known as the anti-rape bill) passed by the last
National Assembly.
According
to Mr. Soyinka, a nation should not be founded on the sexual exploitation of
the fragile and innocent.
“President
Buhari – and here I make my first imposition on his presidency – should never
place his assent on such a nefarious distraction,” Mr. Soyinka had said.
“Its
implications doom the victim to afflictions that churn the stomach even to
think of the human toll. Perhaps those legislators think that vaginal fistula
is something thought up by arm-chair critics with nothing better to occupy
their minds. No matter, let those who profess a genuine concern declare their
stand on this.”
Also,
on Sunday, human rights lawyer and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Femi Falana,
had threatened to go to court if the controversial bill receives a presidential
assent.
Mrs.
Anyanwu said by passing the bill, the National Assembly had kept faith with the
people of Nigeria by providing the cover of protection under which Nigerian
children can live normal lives of fulfilment without fear.
“By
your robust advocacy against the bill preventing sexual abuses of children, you
foreclose the future of children in this society,” the former Senator
said.
“But
if I read you correctly, I have no doubt that you will reverse yourself on this
once you have the correct information. This is why I have written you this
letter.”
Mrs.
Anyanwu said Mr. Soyinka’s first “imposition” on President Buhari is based on
his understanding of the false information circulated by the very offenders he
despised.
“I
plead with you as a man who has been found to be a great man of honour and
bestowed with the highest literary honour in the world to reconsider,” she
said.
“Let
me on behalf of the innumerable victims of abuse in Nigeria; let me invoke the
spirit of Cynthia who fell victim in Lagos; and let me plead on behalf of the
many wives and husbands deliberately infected with HIV by their partners whose
suffering impelled this bill, that you reverse your instruction to Mr.
President.
“The
President of the Federal Republic looks to old sages like you for positive
direction. That was what you intended to give him.
“But
now that you know the truth, for the sake of your long established reputation
and known love for Nigeria, turn it around and urge Mr. President to sign this
bill that will protect our people, restore sanity to society and make Nigeria a
better place for all.”
‘Extreme
Distortion’
The
Sexual Offences Bill, 2015, was among the 46 bills passed by the 7th Senate in
a last minute flurry of activities last week.
The
bill stipulates a life imprisonment for any individual found guilty of rape or
sexual intercourse with children under 11 years; 10 years for incest; 10 years
for child pornography or a fine of N2 million; and 14 years for sexual abuse,
among others.
But
Mrs. Anyanwu insisted that nowhere in the bill passed by Senate was it stated
that an 11 year old could be defiled.
“Nowhere
in the bill passed by the Senate was the age ’11 years’ mentioned,” she
said.
“Here
is what was passed in relation to your area of pre-occupation which is
defilement clause 6 (2): ‘A person who commits an offence of defilement shall
upon conviction be sentenced to imprisonment for life.’
“You
claimed that the bill re-defined ‘female adulthood as marital status.’ Where in
the bill proposed by me and where in the bill passed by Senate did you see
adulthood linked to marital status? The extreme distortion of the spirit,
intent and even content of this bill leads me to think that you may be talking
about an all-together different piece of legislation.
“For
emphasis, let me state that the bill makes no such linkages as you erroneously
stated. I think it may be fear of Sen Yerima that is at play here.
“For
your information, Senator Yerima and all other Senators who participated in the
debate the two times the bill came up on the floor supported it as a vehicle
for instituting a stringent law barring all ranges of sexual offences in
Nigeria.
“They
did this because they also have children, wives, daughters, even mothers and
cannot afford to leave them in the current state where abuses are rewarded with
a slap on the wrist of the perpetrators because our laws are outdated, without
strong in-built deterrence and mechanisms for monitoring and control are
absent.”
Mrs.
Anyanwu described criticisms against the bill as another case of people
demonizing what is clearly in the public good because of deeply-set negative
pre-dispositions towards individuals in an institution.
“By
your strong advocacy against the bill, you have unwittingly stamped your feet
in favour of maintaining the status quo,” she said.
“Where
we are now, the status quo is a world in which a six year old child is raped to
death and then set ablaze. Where we are now is a place where a father rapes his
3 year old boys repeatedly and the mother weeps at night and cannot speak out
of shame and fear of her life.
“Where
we are now is a place where young Cynthia in her struggles for self-employment
ran into a gang who drugged her, raped and murdered her. Where we are now is a
place where foreigners come for tourism and turn children into their objects of
tourism.
“With
all due respect, sir, I want to express my deep disappointment with your
hastiness in flowing with the mob on this matter. I blame your press officers.
I think they should have advised caution. You have known me since the 1990’s.
There is no way you could have sent fellers and I would not jump into the next
flight to answer you.
“In
fact, a mere telephone call could have dispensed with the matter. If you had
even asked someone to get you a copy of the votes and proceedings of Senate for
that day which published the exact words in the legislation passed, you would
have spared yourself the time and emotions spent over what is clear mischief
circulated through the web.”
Mrs.
Anyanwu also described critics of the bill as hate-mongers who are merely
taking advantage of the negative public feelings they have built up against the
legislature.
“I
suspect that some of those fighting against the bill are fixating on the short
title,” she said. “Its long title shows what it is: a sexual offences
prevention bill; a tough deterrence to crime.
“I want you to take time
and read the final copy of the bill. You will be proud. You will realize that
good things can come from Nigeria and Nigerians. It is not only legislation
initiated by outsiders and handed to us locals to push for their passage that
should be deemed as good for us.”
No comments:
Post a Comment