|
Copenhagen
is considering empowering its intelligence services to conduct covert
electronic surveillance on citizens abroad without the need for a court order.
Outraged privacy advocates have pledged to fight the initiative.
Despite
the global outpouring of criticism of the National Security Agency and its
affiliated partners in the so-called Five Eyes spying ring, which was exposed
by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013, it seems the Danish government is
only too willing to take spying to an unprecedented new level.
The story continues:
As
part of a package of new anti-terror initiatives, Copenhagen is now prepared to
empower the Danish Defense Intelligence Service (Forsvarets
Efterretningstjeneste, or FE) with greater snooping authority than the NSA.
The
announcement came in the wake of February 14-15 shootings that put the Danish
capital on high alert after two people were killed, and five police officers
injured.
Last
week, Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt presented a 12-point
anti-terror plan that will cost taxpayers 970 million kroner (US$148m) over the
next four years.
"We want to strengthen our
ability to gather and analyze [information] about terror planning abroad," Thorning-Schmidt told
reporters. "We want to ensure that the
intelligence service is able to monitor Danes who travel abroad to take part in
extremist activities."
Defense
Minister Nicolai Wammen believes it is necessary to track Danes who may travel
abroad to participate in extremist activities, thus posing a national security
risk when they return to Denmark.
"This initiative will enable
us earlier in the process than today to go in and get information that can help
to secure Denmark against potential terrorist attacks. It is a system that suits
Denmark and the serious threats we face, and to ensure our country best,”
Wammen wrote in a statement published in Berlingske News.
However,
plans to give Danish intelligence what appears to be unlimited access to the
electronic communications of Danish citizens abroad is being criticized by
privacy watchdog groups, including the think-tank Justitia and Associate
Professor Anders Henriksen, from the University of Copenhagen.
"Both the rules of the NSA
and GCHQ governing their own nationals abroad is said to contain better
safeguards than the FE proposal. This is especially true for the US system,
where monitoring requires a prior court order of a court. The British system
requires prior approval and fulfillment of certain objective criteria. The order
must be issued by a minister,”
according to the joint analysis, as reported in Politiken.
“Those conditions that normally
need to be met in order to get a court order are not present [in the Danish
proposal]. And when there are weaker grounds for suspicion without independent
controls, there is a risk of abuse,” said the head of Justitia,
Jacob Mchangama.
Danish parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee will debate the proposal in a
closed-door session on Wednesday.
No comments:
Post a Comment