|
South
Korea's Constitutional Court on Thursday struck down a controversial adultery
law which for more than 60 years had criminalized extra-marital sex and jailed
violators for up to two years. The
nine-member bench ruled by seven to two that the 1953 statute aimed at
protecting traditional family values was unconstitutional, according to AFP.
"Even
if adultery should be condemned as immoral, state power should not intervene in
individuals' private lives," said presiding justice Park Han-Chul.
The story continues:
The
decision saw shares in the South Korean firm Unidus Corp., one of the world's
largest condom manufacturers, soar by the daily limit of 15 percent on the
local stock exchange.
It
was the fifth time the apex court had considered the constitutional legality of
the legislation which had made South Korea one of the few non-Muslim countries
to regard marital infidelity as a criminal act.
|
In
the past six years, close to 5,500 people have been formerly arraigned on
adultery charges -- including nearly 900 in 2014.
But
the numbers had been falling, with cases that ended in prison terms
increasingly rare.
Whereas
216 people were jailed under the law in 2004, that figure had dropped to 42 by
2008, and since then only 22 have found themselves behind bars, according to
figures from the state prosecution office.
The
downward trend was partly a reflection of changing societal trends in a country
where rapid modernisation has frequently clashed with traditionally
conservative norms.
- Public views 'have changed' -
"Public
conceptions of individuals' rights in their sexual lives have undergone
changes," Park said, as he delivered the court's decision.
Reading
the dissenting opinion, Justice Ahn Chang-Ho insisted the 1953 statute was a
key protector of family morals, and warned that its abolition would "spark
a surge in debauchery."
Under
the law, adultery could only be prosecuted on complaint from an injured party,
and any case was closed immediately if the plaintiff dropped the charge -- a
common occurrence that often involved a financial settlement.
The
debate over its future had simmered away for years, bubbling over from time to
time especially if a public figure fell foul of the statute.
Such
was the case in 2008 when one of the country's best-known actresses, Ok So-Ri,
was given an eight-month suspended sentence for having an adulterous affair.
At
that time, Ok unsuccessfully petitioned the Constitutional Court, arguing that
the law amounted to a violation of her human rights in the name of revenge.
The
court had previously deliberated the issue in 1990, 1993 and 2001, but those
moves to strike down the law had failed to gain the support of the six judges
required.
Ok's
2008 petition had come close with five judges deeming the statute
unconstitutional.
- Improving gender equality -
The
law was originally designed to protect the rights of women at a time when
marriage afforded them few legal rights, with most having no independent income
and divorce carrying enormous social stigma.
But
even socially conservative civic groups who had supported the legislation in
the past acknowledged that times had changed.
"Adultery
must be censured morally and socially, but such a law is inappropriate in a
modern society," said Ko Seon-Ju, an activist with the Seoul-based civic
group Healthy Families.
"It
used to be an effective legal tool to protect female rights, but equal rights
legislation has improved," Ko said. "Adultery is an issue that should
be dealt with through dialogue between the partners, not by law," she
added.
While
the adultery law may have been ruled out of existence, social disapproval of
marital infidelity remains potent.
In
April last year, South Korea blocked the newly launched Korean version of the
global adultery hook-up site Ashley Madison, saying it threatened family values.
No comments:
Post a Comment