GREENPEACE: The organization’s
inaction against the perpetrators has spurred more female ex-employees to come
out with similar accusations
|
Environment rights NGO Greenpeace India could be in for more trouble as an ex-staffer
has gone public with allegations of rape and sexual harassment by her colleagues.
The organization’s
inaction against the perpetrators has spurred more female ex-employees to come
out with similar accusations. Now, the NGO is at the receiving end with
activists lambasting the organization’s irresponsible handling of the cases.
Recently, Greenpeace was
in the news after the government froze it's accounts for non-compliance of
norms. The Delhi High Court, however, released two of its accounts so that it
could function.
News agency report continues:
In an article published
on a web forum last week, an ex-employee (name withheld) of Greenpeace alleged
that she had to leave her job in 2013 after being sexually harassed and raped
by her colleagues.
Narrating her ordeal, she
said that it started a year after she had joined the NGO at their Bengaluru
office. The first incident happened during an official trip in October 2012.
"I got a call from a senior colleague at 11 pm, asking me to vacate my
room and insisting that I sleep in his suite. In another incident, he
approached me physically despite my discomfort, insisted on force-feeding me
birthday cake,' she told IANS.
Though she registered a
written complaint with the HR manager, she did not receive any verbal or
written communication from the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) of the organization, which
looks into sexual harassment cases. To her shock, she learnt that the person
was a serial offender and no action had been taken against him despite his
misbehaviour with two other female employees.
However, she said, she
was blamed for registering the complaint. "Once in an official meeting, in
my absence, two senior employees indulged in character assassination against
me. Even some female colleagues, part of the ICC, made me feel that I was at
fault, that I didn't know how to 'set boundaries'," she said.
However, matters came to
a head in 2013. "It was after a party, when a male colleague whom I knew
quite well found me unconscious and raped me. You cannot imagine the pain and
fear I went through. I was terrified to speak and I knew even if I had, no one
in this organization would come to my aid. I did not have the strength to
report my rape, neither to the police, nor to my employers. How could I, when
the processes had failed me once already?" she asked. Traumatized, she
left the NGO after a few months.
She said it took her long
to overcome the incident, and finally, she decided to tell her story through a
Facebook post in February this year. Immediately after her post, Greenpeace
issued an apology on their website and promised her to re-investigate the case
in an adequate manner. Admitting the lax attitude in dealing with the case in
2012, the statement said, "The victim deserves both an apology and a
meticulous examination of what happened."
However, the victim
pointed out that the NGO's subsequent actions exposed their empty talk.
"The ICC, which convened in March, recommended the termination of the
offender, but the executive director overrode the decision on some pretext and
the only thing I received was a written apology from the molester,'' she said.
Supporting the claims of
the victim, another ex-senior manager Reema Ganguly, who was a part of the ICC,
told IANS that she quit Greenpeace in May after executive director Samit Aich
overrode the committee's recommendation. "The committee's suggestion of
terminating the molester was overturned by the executive director, and they
dismantled the committee which was only three months old, whereas the duration
(for such a committee) is for three years. It was very clear that the committee
is an eyewash by the NGO,'' said Ganguly.
However, Aich defended
the decision to dismantle the committee. ''We came to know that the committee
decisions were leaked to many people in the office. So I sought legal opinion
on this and I was told that since its leaked, the decision stands invalid. So
we dissolved the committee and reconstituted it,'' said Aich.
When asked why they did
not follow the committee's decision of terminating the offender, Aich said a
strong warning was given to the person. "I have given a strong warning to
the person and as a result, he has put in his papers. I admit that there have
been flaws in our earlier system and we will tighten our disciplinary actions
in future,'' he added.
Reacting to the
allegations, Programme Director for Greenpeace India, Divya Raghunandan, told
IANS that the former employees had raised some valid issues and that they will
investigate it in a "serious manner". Acknowledging that there were
flaws in the earlier system, Raghunandan said, "When we revisited the
cases, we felt that it should have been handled in a better way."
Asserting that they were
re-evaluating the overall procedures for handling complaints of sexual
harassment, she said that the employee in question had resigned. "We have
reconstituted the ICC and ordered an audit into the old cases. The implicated
employee has put in his papers already,'' she said.
"Greenpeace India
reiterates its unconditional apology for the way it responded to the sexual
harassment of one of our colleagues. We did not do justice to her complaint (or
others) and we hope to right these failings in future," said the NGO in a
statement.
"We are
investigating what happened and will ensure these wrongs are made
right...Greenpeace International will also be working closely with the Board
and leadership of Greenpeace India in taking concrete measures to ensure that
the organization is able to deal with these cases effectively, moving
forward," it added.
However, activists and
former employees question the failure of the NGO in punishing a serial offender
and protecting him for years.
Holding the executive
director of Greenpeace India responsible for the shabby handling of the cases,
Kavita Krishnan, Secretary of the All India Progressive Women's Association,
said that the events had tarnished the image of the NGO. "Greenpeace
failed to stand by their promise of punishing the offender. They disbanded a
committee, which recommended punishment for the molester. The NGO is muzzling
voices of dissent. They have stretched the cases for so many years. The
punishment has to be spelt out clearly,'' Krishnan said adding that they have
written to Greenpeace International and were waiting for their response to act
further.
Voicing similar concerns,
Usha Saxena, a former employee, alleged that she was forced to quit Greenpeace
because she took a stand against the rampant cases of harassment in the NGO.
Saxena, who joined Greenpeace in 2009, said that her protests against sexist
jokes and remarks fell on deaf ears. "I filed a misconduct complaint
against senior HR director for making discriminatory and threatening remarks
about my gender, my age and ordering me to seek 'psychological counselling'.
For that, I was bullied out in 2013,'' Saxena told IANS.
Another ex-staffer (name
withheld) also said that she was harassed by the same person implicated in the
first incident. She said she resigned in March 2015 after inaction by the NGO.
"He made some objectionable comments in front of many senior colleagues,
including the executive director. No one reacted, rather they were all amused.
"Though she registered a complaint with the HR Department the next day, it
met the same fate as the previous ones," she told IANS. She also said she
would take further legal action if the offender is not punished.
No comments:
Post a Comment