Bright Okogu, boss of Budget Office and Finance Minister, Ngozi
Okonjo-Iweala
|
Commissioners of Finance and Accountants General of the 36
states of the federation on Tuesday distanced themselves from claims by the
former Minister of Finance, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, that they were part of the
decision to withdraw and spend US$2bn from Nigeria’s excess crude oil revenue
account last December.
Edo State governor, Adams
Oshiomhole, and his Kaduna State counterpart, Nasir El Rufai, had, after the
National Economic Council (NEC) meeting in Abuja on Tuesday last week, accused
Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala of unilaterally approving the withdrawal of about $2.1 bn
from the US$4.1 bn left in the Excess Crude Account (ECA) last November
“without authorization”.
PREMIUM TIMES report continues:
But in a swift reaction,
the former Minister had vehemently rejected the accusation, describing
allegations linking her to the allegations as “false, malicious and totally
without foundation”.
Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala’s
reaction, conveyed through a statement by her Media Adviser, Paul Nwabuikwu,
said all expenditures from the ECA “were discussed at meetings of the
Federation Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC) attended by finance
commissioners from the 36 states”.
“It is curious that in
their desperation to use the esteemed National Economic Council for political
and personal vendetta, the persons behind these allegations acted as if the
constitutionally recognized FAAC, a potent expression of Nigeria’s fiscal
federalism, does not exist,” she said.
But in a stern reaction
on Tuesday in Abuja, members of the FAAC, under the aegis of the Forum of
Commissioners of Finance, disowned the former minister, describing her claim as
“misleading and far from the fact”.
“It has come to our
notice the statement credited to the former Coordinating Minister of the
Economy and Honorable Minister of Finance, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, that the
Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) approved the withdrawal from
Excess Crude (Foreign) Account the sum of Two Billion U.S. Dollar (US$2,000,000,000.00),”
the commissioner said.
“This statement is far
from the fact and is misleading,” the statement said.
The FAAC meeting for
November 2014 ended in confusion when the then Minister of State for Finance,
Bashir Yuguda, could not explain how the balance in the ECA had dropped from US$4.1
bn at the end of October to US$3.1 bn.
Prior to the October FAAC
meeting, Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala had told reporters that the balance of the ECA
stood at US$4.11bn, while the country’s external reserves rose from $36.6bn in
June to US$39.48billion as at October 16.
Regardless, the then
Chairman of the Forum of State Commissioners of Finance and former Ebonyi State
Commissioner of Finance, Timothy Odaah, had denied knowledge of any decision to
withdraw from the account, insisting that none of its members was aware of the
withdrawal.
“No state knew how the US$1
bn difference reported in the Excess Crude Account balance, between October and
November, came about,” Mr. Odaah told reporters then. “The discrepancy has been
noted for discussion at the next FAAC meeting. It calls to question how
transparent the management of the excess crude revenues has been.”
Till the end of his
tenure, Mr. Odaah, who later claimed reconciliation was ongoing with the
Finance Minister, did not reveal his findings.
However, several months
later, Mr. Oshiomhole stirred the controversy afresh last week with the
allegation that the former minister was economical with the truth about the
country’s finances.
Mr. Oshiomhole had
lambasted Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala over her claims that Nigerians knew what the three
tiers of government usually collect through the State Finance Commissioners who
usually attend the monthly FAAC meetings.
The power to take money
from the ECA, Mr. Oshiomhole argued, is vested in the NEC, an institution
created by the constitution, and not State Finance Commissioners, who are not
known by the constitution.
In disowning Mrs.
Okonjo-Iweala, the Commissioners’ Forum pointed out that the law setting up
FAAC, which predates the ECA, “cannot approve withdrawal and has not done so in
the past.”
If anything, the
Commissioners said, records of FAAC meetings show that members have always
queried the activities on the ECA, and therefore did not decide any withdrawal.
Although the Commissioners
said they observed the withdrawal of US$2bn from the ECA in December 2014, the
then Minister of State Finance and Chairman of FAAC, Mr. Yuguda, had explained
during plenary that approval came from former President Goodluck Jonathan.
The withdrawals were to
help pay subsidy claims to oil marketers, who had threaten to stop importing
petroleum products.
“FAAC did not and could not
have approved, nor took the decision to withdraw the sum of Two Billion U.S.
Dollar (US$2,000,000,000.00) from the Excess Crude Account,” the Commissioners
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment