In this Tuesday, May 19, 2015 file photo, FIFA President Sepp
Blatter attends a press conference in Jerusalem. (AP Photo/Tsafrir Abayov)
|
As FIFA slid toward what has now become a full-blown collapse
of its reputation and credibility, one of Sepp Blatter's advisers suggested to
the president of football's governing body that he should lift the lid on one
of his most tightly guarded secrets.
Reveal
how much FIFA pays you, Mark Pieth advised. The Swiss anti-corruption expert,
recruited by FIFA for his expertise in corporate governance, says he argued
that disclosing Blatter's salary would demonstrate that the discredited
organization is committed to change and transparency.
Blatter wouldn't have it.
Pieth says the FIFA president explained that doing so risked
embarrassing and upsetting his allies on the FIFA board whose pay is also
secret.
Associated Press report continues:
"He told me: 'Well, you know, I couldn't,'" the
Basel University professor recalls. "'It wouldn't go down well with my
friends.'"
One million dollars? Five million? More than that? Two years
after Blatter rejected Pieth's advice, the exact extent of his salary and perks
remain known only by him and a seeming tiny handful of perhaps no more than
four others at FIFA headquarters.
Here is a look at why the
secrecy should be lifted:
SET AN EXAMPLE: Founded in 1904 with the simple aim of
organizing football internationally, FIFA has grown into a multi-billion dollar
global enterprise largely thanks to the World Cup's financial success under Blatter's
reign since 1998.
Like multi-national
corporations, it publishes detailed annual financial accounts and is audited.
Beset by allegations of vote-buying and corruption involving members of its
ruling executive committee, FIFA also in 2011 launched reforms that tightened
the way it does business but which haven't gone far enough for its many
critics.
Failing to publish the
pay of Blatter and other executives gives the impression that FIFA must still
have something to hide, when it should set an example for football to follow.
"The old idea is
these guys just put their hand in the till and distribute money wildly because
they have so much of it," Pieth said in a phone interview with The
Associated Press.
OTHERS DO BETTER: Some football organizations are far more open,
making FIFA look secretive.
Obliged to do so by U.S. law, the U.S. Soccer Federation that
governs the sport in the United States files tax returns that give astounding
detail about executive compensation when compared to FIFA. The filings are easy
to find on the federation website.
The most recent shows
federation CEO Dan Flynn got a base salary of US$528,209, plus US$102,250 in
bonuses, for an average 40 hours of work per week in the 2013 tax year and even
that the federation pays his health club bill of US$180 per month.
The accounts for
England's Football Association, also accessible via its website, aren't as
transparent but do show — as required by British law — that the highest paid
director got 550,000 pounds (US$850,000) in salary and benefits.
Governed by Swiss law, FIFA's public accounts lack such
detail. They say US$39.7 million was paid to "key management
personnel" in 2014. That included Blatter and the 24 other members of his
executive committee, plus 12 executives at FIFA headquarters. If evenly split
between all 37 people, that would be US$1 million each. FIFA says the total
includes gross salary and social charges but won't break down who got what or
even answer questions about why it fails to do so.
"We have no further comments on individual
compensation," it said by email to the AP.
COPY CONCACAF: The governing body for football in the North and
Central Americas and the Caribbean has been hit hard by the latest corruption
scandal. Its former general secretary, Chuck Blazer, pleaded guilty in the
United States to racketeering, income tax evasion, wire fraud and money
laundering conspiracies and was banned from the game for life on Thursday by
FIFA's ethics committee.
To prevent the confederation from imploding, CONCACAF this
week announced reforms that include exemplary policies on pay which will be
more transparent than FIFA's. As U.S. Soccer does, tax returns reporting
executive salaries will be published on CONCACAF's website. CONCACAF is also
proposing that executives' compensation be approved annually by its congress.
These changes could
pressure others, including FIFA, to follow suit.
"We think if we can
do it, they can do it," CONCACAF legal adviser Sam Gandhi said in an AP
phone interview. "Sports federations shouldn't be worried about the truth.
... If people are valuable, people recognize that they should be paid a
valuable amount. But we shouldn't have anything to hide when it comes to this
stuff."
COST VS. WORTH: FIFA executive committee members are treated
like royalty, housed in the best hotels, ferried in limousines and, on top of
reportedly generous per diems when conducting FIFA business, also paid US$300,000
a year, one insider confirmed to AP.
Without breaking down the
expenses, FIFA's accounts show it spends a prince's ransom on meetings: US$35.5
million in 2014, including travel and accommodation for its 209 member
associations to a congress in Brazil.
Jim Boyce, an executive
committee member from 2011-2015, bristled at the suggestion that FIFA is overly
lavish.
"Bankers, for example, are getting millions of bloody
bonuses and all the rest of it and their banks are going down the tube,"
he said in an AP interview. "There are many people in many walks of life
who are paid a salary for doing a job ... That's a personal thing between a
company and the employee. It's not dishonest if people pay their taxes."
But without detail on who
gets what exactly, it's impossible for outsiders to judge whether FIFA and the
sport it is meant to serve is getting value for money.
OBSTACLES: When Blatter announced
June 2 that he'll be standing down, he also said he would use his remaining
months to drive "far-reaching, fundamental reforms." Domenico Scala,
overseeing that effort, said one goal is to publish the pay of the president
and executive committee members, because "FIFA recognizes that many have
questioned the transparency by which FIFA operates."
But how that will be done and whose approval they need wasn't
explained, and FIFA wouldn't elaborate when asked by AP. While some executives
say they wouldn't mind if their salaries are made public, others from countries
where pay is seen as more of a private matter and not easily discussed may
resist.
And Blatter's record doesn't inspire confidence that he can
pass this last big test of his presidency.
"Whenever Blatter has a choice where to side whether
with his friends or with the general public, with the critics and so on,"
noted Pieth, "he chose to side with his friends."
No comments:
Post a Comment